Solving Quadratic Equations by Using the Quadratic Formula
Questions designed to stretch thinking, reveal misconceptions, and spark mathematical reasoning.
Convince Me That…
Students must construct a mathematical argument for why each statement is true.
Using the quadratic formula with \( a = 2 \), \( b = 3 \), \( c = -5 \): the discriminant is \( b^2 \; – \; 4ac = 9 \; – \; 4(2)(-5) = 9 + 40 = 49 \). Since the discriminant is positive, the ± in the formula produces two different values: \( x = \frac{-3 + 7}{4} = 1 \) and \( x = \frac{-3 \; – \; 7}{4} = \frac{-10}{4} = -2.5 \). We can verify: \( 2(1)^2 + 3(1) \; – \; 5 = 0 \) โ and \( 2(-2.5)^2 + 3(-2.5) \; – \; 5 = 12.5 \; – \; 7.5 \; – \; 5 = 0 \) โ.
The ± symbol in the formula is what generates two solutions. A common mistake is the “only using one branch of ±” error — computing only \( \frac{-b + \sqrt{\text{disc}}}{2a} \) or only \( \frac{-b \; – \; \sqrt{\text{disc}}}{2a} \), giving just one solution. Every quadratic equation has the potential for two solutions — the discriminant determines whether those solutions are distinct, repeated, or non-real.
Using the formula with \( a = 1 \), \( b = -8 \), \( c = 16 \): the discriminant is \( (-8)^2 \; – \; 4(1)(16) = 64 \; – \; 64 = 0 \). So \( x = \frac{8 \pm \sqrt{0}}{2} = \frac{8}{2} = 4 \). Since \( \sqrt{0} = 0 \), the + and − paths give the same value. We can verify: \( 4^2 \; – \; 8(4) + 16 = 16 \; – \; 32 + 16 = 0 \) โ. Notice that \( x^2 \; – \; 8x + 16 = (x \; – \; 4)^2 \), confirming this is a perfect square with a single repeated root.
Students often assume that because the formula contains ±, it must always produce two different answers. When the discriminant equals zero, the ± adds and subtracts nothing, so both routes collapse to a single solution. This is called a repeated root.
The quadratic formula requires the equation in the form \( ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \). Crucially, the Right Hand Side must be zero. In \( x^2 + 3 = 4x \), if a student tries to read off values directly, they might set \( a = 1 \), \( b = 3 \), \( c = 4 \) — but \( b \) is the coefficient of the \( x \) term, and there is no \( x \) term on the left as written. Rearranging gives \( x^2 \; – \; 4x + 3 = 0 \), so \( a = 1 \), \( b = -4 \), \( c = 3 \). The correct solutions are \( x = \frac{4 \pm \sqrt{16 \; – \; 12}}{2} = \frac{4 \pm 2}{2} \), giving \( x = 3 \) or \( x = 1 \).
Using the wrong values (e.g. \( b = 3 \)) would give a completely different discriminant and incorrect answers. The formula is derived from completing the square on \( ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \), so the equation must be in this form for \( a \), \( b \), and \( c \) to have their proper meaning.
With \( a = 1 \), \( b = -2 \), \( c = -5 \): the discriminant is \( 4 \; – \; 4(1)(-5) = 4 + 20 = 24 \). Since 24 is not a perfect square (\( 4^2 = 16 \), \( 5^2 = 25 \)), \( \sqrt{24} \) is irrational. The solutions are \( x = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{24}}{2} = \frac{2 \pm 2\sqrt{6}}{2} = 1 \pm \sqrt{6} \). Since \( \sqrt{6} \approx 2.449 \), the two solutions are approximately 3.449 and −1.449 — neither is a whole number.
Note on precision: Students often rush to the calculator to get the decimal approximation. However, the form \( 1 \pm \sqrt{6} \) is the exact answer. It is better to keep the surd form until the very last step to avoid rounding errors.
Give an Example Of…
Think carefully — the fourth box is a trap! Give a non-example that looks right but isn’t.
Example: \( x^2 \; – \; 5x + 6 = 0 \) → \( x = \frac{5 \pm 1}{2} \), so \( x = 3 \) or \( x = 2 \).
Another: \( x^2 \; – \; 7x + 10 = 0 \) → \( x = \frac{7 \pm 3}{2} \), so \( x = 5 \) or \( x = 2 \).
Creative: \( x^2 \; – \; 3x + 1 = 0 \) → discriminant = 5, so \( x = \frac{3 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2} \approx 2.618 \) or \( \approx 0.382 \). Both positive, but neither is an integer — showing that “two positive solutions” doesn’t require nice numbers.
Trap: \( x^2 + 5x + 6 = 0 \) → \( x = \frac{-5 \pm 1}{2} \), so \( x = -2 \) or \( x = -3 \). Both solutions are negative. A student might see positive coefficients 5 and 6 and assume the solutions are positive, but the \( -b \) in the formula means the sign of \( b \) directly affects the sign of the solutions. To get positive solutions when \( a = 1 \), you need \( b < 0 \).
Example: \( x^2 \; – \; 4x + 4 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 16 \; – \; 16 = 0 \), so \( x = 2 \) (repeated root).
Another: \( x^2 + 6x + 9 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 36 \; – \; 36 = 0 \), so \( x = -3 \) (repeated root).
Creative: \( 4x^2 \; – \; 4x + 1 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 16 \; – \; 16 = 0 \), so \( x = \frac{1}{2} \) (repeated root). This shows the discriminant can be zero even when \( a \neq 1 \) and the repeated root can be a fraction.
Trap: \( x^2 \; – \; 8x + 8 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 64 \; – \; 32 = 32 \neq 0 \). A student might see the two 8s and assume they “cancel” in the discriminant, but \( b^2 \; – \; 4ac = (-8)^2 \; – \; 4(1)(8) = 64 \; – \; 32 \), not \( 64 \; – \; 64 \). For \( a = 1 \), the discriminant is zero only when \( c = \frac{b^2}{4} \) — here that would require \( c = 16 \), not 8.
Example: \( x^2 = 3x \; – \; 2 \) → rearranges to \( x^2 \; – \; 3x + 2 = 0 \), so \( a = 1 \), \( b = -3 \), \( c = 2 \).
Another: \( 2x^2 + 1 = 5x \) → rearranges to \( 2x^2 \; – \; 5x + 1 = 0 \), so \( a = 2 \), \( b = -5 \), \( c = 1 \).
Creative: \( x(x + 3) = 4 \) → expand first: \( x^2 + 3x = 4 \), then rearrange to \( x^2 + 3x \; – \; 4 = 0 \). This requires two steps (expand, then rearrange) before the formula can be used.
Trap: \( 3x^2 \; – \; 6x + 3 = 0 \). This is already in standard form (\( a = 3 \), \( b = -6 \), \( c = 3 \)), so no rearranging is needed. A student might think the 3 out front means it needs manipulation, but the formula can be applied directly.
Example: \( x^2 \; – \; 4x + 1 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 12 \), so \( x = \frac{4 \pm 2\sqrt{3}}{2} = 2 \pm \sqrt{3} \).
Another: \( x^2 + 6x + 4 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 20 \), so \( x = \frac{-6 \pm 2\sqrt{5}}{2} = -3 \pm \sqrt{5} \).
Creative: \( x^2 + 14x + 2 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 196 \; – \; 8 = 188 = 4 \times 47 \), so \( x = \frac{-14 \pm 2\sqrt{47}}{2} = -7 \pm \sqrt{47} \). Note: The question asks for the form \( p \pm \sqrt{r} \). You can only reach this form if the denominator cancels out completely with a factor from the numerator (i.e. if \( b \) is even and the discriminant is a multiple of 4).
Trap: \( x^2 \; – \; 2x \; – \; 3 = 0 \) → discriminant \( = 4 + 12 = 16 = 4^2 \). Since the discriminant is a perfect square, the solutions are \( x = \frac{2 \pm 4}{2} = 3 \) or \( -1 \) — rational numbers, not surds. A student might see the −3 and think the formula will give something messy, but the discriminant being a perfect square means the solutions simplify neatly.
Always, Sometimes, Never
Is the statement always true, sometimes true, or never true? Students should justify their decision with examples.
This depends entirely on the discriminant \( b^2 \; – \; 4ac \). When the discriminant is positive, the equation has two distinct real solutions — for example, \( x^2 + x \; – \; 6 = 0 \) has discriminant 25, giving \( x = 2 \) and \( x = -3 \). When the discriminant is zero, there is exactly one repeated solution — for example, \( x^2 \; – \; 8x + 16 = 0 \) gives only \( x = 4 \). When the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions at all — for example, \( x^2 + 1 = 0 \) has discriminant \( -4 \).
Students often believe the quadratic formula “always gives two answers” because they see the ± symbol. The visual connection is key:
When \( c = 0 \), the equation becomes \( ax^2 + bx = 0 \), which factors as \( x(ax + b) = 0 \). This immediately gives \( x = 0 \) or \( x = -\frac{b}{a} \) — no formula needed. For example, \( 3x^2 + 12x = 0 \) factors as \( 3x(x + 4) = 0 \), giving \( x = 0 \) or \( x = -4 \). This factorisation works for any values of \( a \) and \( b \) (provided \( a \neq 0 \)).
Students sometimes reach for the quadratic formula automatically without checking whether simpler methods work. Spotting that \( c = 0 \) means every term contains \( x \), so \( x \) factors out immediately. The formula will give the same answers, but factorising is faster and less error-prone.
The formula gives integer solutions when two conditions are met: the discriminant \( b^2 \; – \; 4ac \) must be a perfect square, and \( -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 \; – \; 4ac} \) must be divisible by \( 2a \). For example, \( x^2 \; – \; 7x + 12 = 0 \) has discriminant \( 49 \; – \; 48 = 1 \) and gives \( x = \frac{7 \pm 1}{2} \), so \( x = 4 \) and \( x = 3 \) (integers). But \( x^2 \; – \; 6x + 2 = 0 \) has discriminant \( 36 \; – \; 8 = 28 \), so the solutions are \( 3 \pm \sqrt{7} \) (irrational, not integers).
Students often expect “nice” answers from the quadratic formula and become unsettled when surds appear. In fact, most randomly chosen quadratic equations produce irrational solutions — integer solutions are the special case, not the norm.
A negative discriminant means there are no real solutions — not one. The formula gives \( x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{\text{negative}}}{2a} \), and the square root of a negative number is not a real number. For example, \( x^2 + 2x + 5 = 0 \) has discriminant \( 4 \; – \; 20 = -16 \), and there is no real value of \( x \) that satisfies the equation. The graph of \( y = x^2 + 2x + 5 \) does not cross the \( x \)-axis at all.
This targets the confusion between “one solution” (discriminant = 0, where the graph just touches the axis) and “no real solutions” (discriminant < 0, where the graph misses the axis entirely). Students sometimes conflate these two cases because both feel like “something unusual” happening.
Odd One Out
Which is the odd one out? Can you make a case for each one? There’s no single right answer!
Explain the Mistake
Each example contains a deliberate error targeting a common misconception. Can you find where and why the reasoning goes wrong?
Answer: \( x = 3 \) or \( x = 2 \)
Reasoning: “I put \( a = 2 \), \( b = -5 \), \( c = 3 \) into the formula. The discriminant is \( 25 \; – \; 24 = 1 \). So \( x = \frac{5 \pm 1}{2} \). That gives \( x = 3 \) or \( x = 2 \).”
The student correctly identified \( a \), \( b \), \( c \) and correctly computed the discriminant as 1. The error is in the denominator: they divided by 2 instead of \( 2a = 2 \times 2 = 4 \). This is the “dividing by 2 instead of 2a” misconception. The formula has \( 2a \) in the denominator, not just 2.
The correct calculation is \( x = \frac{5 \pm 1}{4} \), giving \( x = \frac{6}{4} = 1.5 \) or \( x = \frac{4}{4} = 1 \). We can verify: \( 2(1.5)^2 \; – \; 5(1.5) + 3 = 4.5 \; – \; 7.5 + 3 = 0 \) โ and \( 2(1)^2 \; – \; 5(1) + 3 = 0 \) โ. The student’s answers of 3 and 2 do not satisfy the equation: \( 2(3)^2 \; – \; 5(3) + 3 = 18 \; – \; 15 + 3 = 6 \neq 0 \).
Answer: \( x = 1 \) โ
Reasoning: “I used \( x = \frac{-b}{2a} \). So \( x = \frac{-(-2)}{2(1)} = \frac{2}{2} = 1 \). Easy — you don’t need the square root bit.”
The student has the correct answer (\( x = 1 \)), but their reasoning reveals the “incomplete formula” misconception — they have dropped the \( \pm\sqrt{b^2 \; – \; 4ac} \) term entirely and are treating \( x = \frac{-b}{2a} \) as the complete quadratic formula. This happened to give the right answer only because the discriminant here is \( 4 \; – \; 4 = 0 \), so the missing \( \pm\sqrt{0} \) contributes nothing.
For any equation where the discriminant is not zero, this shortcut fails. For example, applying \( x = \frac{-b}{2a} \) to \( x^2 \; – \; 4x + 3 = 0 \) gives \( x = 2 \), but the actual solutions are \( x = 1 \) and \( x = 3 \). Getting the right answer once does not mean the method is correct — it means the student got lucky with this particular equation.
Answer: \( x = 2 \) or \( x = -5 \)
Reasoning: “I put \( a = 1 \), \( b = -3 \), \( c = -10 \). The discriminant is \( 9 + 40 = 49 \). So \( x = \frac{-3 \pm 7}{2} \). That gives \( x = \frac{-3 + 7}{2} = 2 \) or \( x = \frac{-3 \; – \; 7}{2} = -5 \).”
The discriminant calculation is correct (\( (-3)^2 \; – \; 4(1)(-10) = 9 + 40 = 49 \) โ), but the student has made a “sign error with −b”. Since \( b = -3 \), the formula gives \( -b = -(-3) = +3 \), so the numerator should be \( 3 \pm 7 \), not \( -3 \pm 7 \).
The correct calculation is \( x = \frac{3 \pm 7}{2} \), giving \( x = 5 \) or \( x = -2 \). Self-check strategy: You can always check the Sum of Roots. The sum should be \( -b/a \). Here, \( -(-3)/1 = 3 \). The student’s roots sum to \( 2 + (-5) = -3 \). Since \( -3 \neq 3 \), they could have spotted the error immediately!
Answer: “The discriminant is 0, so there is one repeated root: \( x = -2 \)”
Reasoning: “The discriminant is \( b^2 \; – \; 4ac = 4 \; – \; 4(1)(1) = 4 \; – \; 4 = 0 \). Since it’s zero, there’s one solution: \( x = \frac{-4}{2} = -2 \).”
The student has made the “forgetting to square b” error in the discriminant calculation. They wrote \( b^2 = 4 \), but \( b = 4 \), so \( b^2 = 16 \), not 4. The student has used the value of \( b \) itself (4) rather than \( b^2 \) (16). This is a common confusion between \( b \) and \( b^2 \), especially when \( b \) happens to be a small number.
The correct discriminant is \( 16 \; – \; 4 = 12 \). Since \( 12 > 0 \), there are two distinct solutions: \( x = \frac{-4 \pm \sqrt{12}}{2} = \frac{-4 \pm 2\sqrt{3}}{2} = -2 \pm \sqrt{3} \), approximately −0.27 and −3.73.
Answer: \( 4 \pm 4\sqrt{5} \)
Reasoning: “I divided the 8 by 2 to get 4. You can’t divide the surd part because it’s in a square root, so that stays the same.”
This is the “Heart-Shape Simplification” error. The student only divided one part of the numerator by the denominator. When simplifying a fraction like this, the denominator must divide both terms in the numerator.
The correct calculation is: \( \frac{8}{2} \pm \frac{4\sqrt{5}}{2} \). Since \( \frac{8}{2} = 4 \) AND \( \frac{4\sqrt{5}}{2} = 2\sqrt{5} \), the correct simplified answer is \( 4 \pm 2\sqrt{5} \).